[edited by HandyLex.org The study, entitled "The Social Security change the" rules "of the verification disability support is available by clicking here ]
could be "more severe than they appear" - according to the Service HandyLex.org - The consequences for citizens, who in recent days after the Director General has called for INPS, with an internal circular to the Regional Directors, the priority action to direct visit, additional to that already made by the Commission ASL, in the event of a finding of disability, handicap and disability. Let's try to understand why
"With an internal memo - inform the service HandyLex.org - INPS favors using priority to direct visit, additional to that already made by the ASL for citizens requiring proof of ' disability. This means that a growing number of citizens will be subjected to two visits before they are possibly given the status of invalids, blind, deaf or disabled people. " "It - is increasingly added to HandyLex.org - a significant step back from the particulars regulations is that compared to previous guidance of the Institute." Let us briefly why the latter view, referring to any depth to the wide analysis carried out by the website that deals with legislation on disability (click here ). As is well known, in setting new standards and expertise to the investigation, the Law 102/09 (Article 20) ruled that the 1 January 2010, applications for disability, handicap and disability were submitted to INPS and not on the ASL. These arrangements were then made operational by the INPS Circular No 131 of 28 December 2009.La new composition of the Boards ASL (integrated with a doctor INPS) was to provide an advantage in terms of time savings as well as undoubted management. Circular No. 131, in fact, provided that if after visiting the minutes were approved unanimously, the document - validated by the Managing Director Forensic INPS - would be sent to the addressee by the same Authority, also active, in the case of provision of pensions, disability benefits or the administrative flow of them. Only in doubtful cases or in situations of disagreement, however, should have been used to direct visits, while still allowing a wide use of the evaluation of acts, ie not to disturb the Cittadino.Ebbene, with a recent internal communications (not spread to the official website) of 20 September 2010 by the Director General to INPS All Regional Directors of The (communication "reinforced" by some guidelines), it is considered "essential to reinforce the use of direct health care to the establishment of the person with the objective of verifying the existence or the permanence of the health requirements." Even if the note - comments HandyLex.org - states that the intent is to make "the definitive review of forensic health INPS, with the declared aim to avoid future inconvenience to citizens resulting from successive health checks outstanding ", it seems that the purpose is to tighten further the mechanisms of control and restriction of the benefits granted. Arguably, almost a year later, the INPS is detecting that the system does not work: Local Health Boards in many, in fact, the INPS doctor is not present and also the complete health records are not transmitted to the INPS. Above all, the granting of economic benefits are resuming their normal course. "At this paragraph refers, as mentioned above, extensive analysis of HandyLex.org to assess what the possible consequences for citizens ("more severe than it appears, "is underlined in the portal). (SB)
Source Superando.it
could be "more severe than they appear" - according to the Service HandyLex.org - The consequences for citizens, who in recent days after the Director General has called for INPS, with an internal circular to the Regional Directors, the priority action to direct visit, additional to that already made by the Commission ASL, in the event of a finding of disability, handicap and disability. Let's try to understand why
"With an internal memo - inform the service HandyLex.org - INPS favors using priority to direct visit, additional to that already made by the ASL for citizens requiring proof of ' disability. This means that a growing number of citizens will be subjected to two visits before they are possibly given the status of invalids, blind, deaf or disabled people. " "It - is increasingly added to HandyLex.org - a significant step back from the particulars regulations is that compared to previous guidance of the Institute." Let us briefly why the latter view, referring to any depth to the wide analysis carried out by the website that deals with legislation on disability (click here ). As is well known, in setting new standards and expertise to the investigation, the Law 102/09 (Article 20) ruled that the 1 January 2010, applications for disability, handicap and disability were submitted to INPS and not on the ASL. These arrangements were then made operational by the INPS Circular No 131 of 28 December 2009.La new composition of the Boards ASL (integrated with a doctor INPS) was to provide an advantage in terms of time savings as well as undoubted management. Circular No. 131, in fact, provided that if after visiting the minutes were approved unanimously, the document - validated by the Managing Director Forensic INPS - would be sent to the addressee by the same Authority, also active, in the case of provision of pensions, disability benefits or the administrative flow of them. Only in doubtful cases or in situations of disagreement, however, should have been used to direct visits, while still allowing a wide use of the evaluation of acts, ie not to disturb the Cittadino.Ebbene, with a recent internal communications (not spread to the official website) of 20 September 2010 by the Director General to INPS All Regional Directors of The (communication "reinforced" by some guidelines), it is considered "essential to reinforce the use of direct health care to the establishment of the person with the objective of verifying the existence or the permanence of the health requirements." Even if the note - comments HandyLex.org - states that the intent is to make "the definitive review of forensic health INPS, with the declared aim to avoid future inconvenience to citizens resulting from successive health checks outstanding ", it seems that the purpose is to tighten further the mechanisms of control and restriction of the benefits granted. Arguably, almost a year later, the INPS is detecting that the system does not work: Local Health Boards in many, in fact, the INPS doctor is not present and also the complete health records are not transmitted to the INPS. Above all, the granting of economic benefits are resuming their normal course. "At this paragraph refers, as mentioned above, extensive analysis of HandyLex.org to assess what the possible consequences for citizens ("more severe than it appears, "is underlined in the portal). (SB)
Source Superando.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment